4

US Diamond Trade: The Figures Reveal Oddities

US Diamond Trade: The Figures Reveal Oddities - featured image
Share this:

Diamond import and export figures can tell a story, and a good story sparkles with oddities. Good stories start with facts that raise questions. In this case, the question is why a consumer market would import eight times the amount of diamonds it consumes. Or how a country with no diamond mining might export more rough than it imports.

Polished Diamond Trade – Sliding Import Figures

First, the facts: According to the US International Trade Commission, gross polished diamond imports totaled $21.67 billion in 2017. The volume of imports was 9.9 million carats. This is a 3% decline in value and a 10.4% decline in volume compared to 2016. The gross imports averaged $2,190 per carat, an 8.2% year-over-year increase.

Polished diamond exports also declined: 10.5 million carats worth $18 billion, a 4.4% decline by value and 5.8% by volume. The trend in the past few years is that imports of loose diamonds are shrinking in value and volume, while exports are seesawing.

Value of US Polished Diamond Trade 2013 – 2017Value of US Polished Diamond Trade 2013 - 2017

Source: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

While the US imported polished diamonds from 82 different countries, four of these alone were the source of 91% of gross imports by value: India, Israel, Belgium, and South Africa. Two of the four, India and Belgium, lost market share, while Israel increased its market share.

Leading US Polished Diamond Suppliers – Value (Gross)Leading US Polished Diamond Suppliers – Value (Gross) 2016-2017

Source: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

Polished Diamond Trade Oddities

The odd trend to pay attention to is that of net imports. Whereas the value of net imports was $3.65 billion, the volume of imports had a negative value of -596,822 carats in 2017. How can a consumer market export more goods than it imports?

The decline in desire to pick out a diamond and set it in a jewelry item of choice is an indication that American consumers are losing their appetite for diamonds. And that is the important takeaway from these figures.
This is not an issue of a surplus from past years. In fact, this is anything but uncharacteristic. Ever since 2004, the US has been exporting more polished diamonds than it imports. The total volume of these over-exports is 85.6 million carats throughout the 14-year period. Polished diamond exports exceeded imports during every single one of these years.

One possible explanation is that the US International Trade Commission is getting it wrong. Maybe, but this body is an independent, quasi-judicial Federal agency with broad investigative responsibilities on matters of trade. Its mission is to (1) administer US trade remedy laws within its mandate in a fair and objective manner; (2) provide the President, USTR, and Congress with independent analysis, information, and support on matters of tariffs, international trade, and US competitiveness; and (3) maintain the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS). This is a serious body.

Perhaps customs is not reporting it accurately. However, a long-lasting inaccuracy is not an error. It is a trend. Another possibility is smuggling. A large volume of polished diamonds smuggled into the US could account for export oddities.

Volume of US Polished Diamond Trade 2013-2017Volume of US Polished Diamond Trade 2013-2017

Source: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

Rough Diamond Trade – Record Import Figures

In 2017, the US imported a record $1.01 billion worth of rough diamonds. In contrast, the volume of imports were a low 587,016 carats, way below the average import levels of the past 15 years. Gross rough diamond imports increased 23.3% by value and decreased 4.7% by volume.

The odd trend to pay attention to is that of net imports. How can a consumer market export more goods than it imports?
This is not entirely surprising. The decline in volume is a result of the decline in diamond polishing in the US. Once a major diamond manufacturing center, American polishers lost their competitiveness to lower labor-cost countries such as India – just as Belgium and Israel lost their prominence in the field. And like Belgium and Israel, US manufacturers focus on high-value diamonds where labor is a small (and at times negligible) component of the cost of the resulting polished diamond.

The shift to higher-value diamonds partially explains the ongoing rise in total value of gross imports, as well as the rising average value of rough diamonds. In 2017, the average per-carat value of gross rough diamond imports reached a record $1,806 per carat, up 29.4% year-over-year.

Five Years of US Rough Diamond Trade by ValueFive Years of US Rough Diamond Trade by Value

Source: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

The rise in imports follows an ongoing rise in exports. The US exported $937.8 million worth of rough diamonds, in 2017. The volume of exports was 1.8 million carats. Year-over-year, exports rose 55.7% by value and a staggering 343% by volume.

For the past two years, the leading rough diamond supplier by value to the US has been Botswana, dethroning longtime leading supplier South Africa. Botswana was the source of $629 million worth of rough, nearly double its supply in 2016.

Leading US Rough Diamond Suppliers in 2017 – Value (Gross)

Leading US Rough Diamond Suppliers in 2017 – Value (Gross)Source: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

The top four countries supplying rough diamonds to the US accounted for 91% of total supply by value, up from 86% that the top suppliers held in 2016. Another notable change is the drop in Angola’s supply, down 43% year-over-year. This could be due to internal changes in personal in Angola’s diamond industry and a reshuffling that is taking place in the wake of President José Eduardo dos Santos stepping down.

Leading US Rough Diamond Suppliers in 2016 – Value (Gross)

Leading US Rough Diamond Suppliers in 2016 – Value (Gross)Source: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

Rough Diamond Trade Oddities

The net effect of rising imports and exports is an ongoing trend of dwindling net imports by value. However, net trade in volume is once again negative – 1.2 million carats. In the past 15 years, the US tended to export more rough diamonds than it imported – and the US is not a diamond producing country – at least in terms of diamond mines because the amount of rough may indicate that American ingenuity created a new source of diamonds.

In the last 15 years the US exported 73% more than it imported. That is an excess of 9 million carats between 2003 and 2017.
Let that sink in for a moment: The US exported more than triple the amount of diamonds than it imported. In the last five years, it exported 45% more than it imported, in the last 10 years 60% more, and in the last 15 years 73% more than it imported. That is an excess of 9 million carats between 2003 and 2017.

Where are all that rough diamonds coming from? Why are so many rough diamonds entering the country in the first place? Does the US have a secret diamond mine? Is this an issue of poor tracking or even signs of money laundering? Be that as it may, this is an ongoing issue that needs to be addressed.

Five Years of US Rough Diamond Trade by Volume

Five Years of US Rough Diamond Trade by VolumeSource: US International Trade Commission, Edahn Golan analysis

Loss of Desire for Diamonds

However the oddities are explained, the US is a market in constant change. The decline in imports of loose polished diamonds means that less diamond setting is taking place in the US. Some of it has to do with the decline in diamond jewelry manufacturing. But some of it has to do with the shift in American taste. The decline in desire to pick out a diamond and set it in a jewelry item of choice is an indication that American consumers are losing their appetite for diamonds. And that is the important takeaway from these figures.

Alongside marketing to turn this tide around, the US diamond industry needs to urgently address the issue of over-exports. If it is seen with both rough and polished diamonds over an extended period of time, with goods tracked by different government agencies, than this is not a fluke nor an error. It is a problem. This problem needs to be worked out before US consumers turn a cold shoulder to diamonds because they suspect foul play in their own backyard.

P.S. – We now have an Instagram account. If quick bits of information are of interest, you are welcome to follow @edahngolandiamond.

DRC: 3% of Artisanal Diamond Diggers Are Women
Rough Diamonds’ Loopy Ride
Comments 4
  1. Good coverage, Edahn, and maybe an easy explanation. The US is a diamond mine. Exports exceeding imports could reflect (in my opinion, do reflect) the large volume of diamonds being recycled. It would be reasonable to estimate that $1.5-2.0 trillion in diamonds were imported into the US over 4 or 5 decades. Maybe a good deal more. As most people have seen, there are many companies now handling volumes of recycled diamonds in the US. This process has, of course, gone on for years, but the rapidly increasing retirements of the Boomers, the important demographic in making those purchases over the years, the volume of “estate” diamonds re-entering the market has blossomed. Ergo, more goods leaving the country than ever before.
    As for the change in consumer sentiment, there is a factor at work besides the apparent drift away from diamonds. As the leisure and luxury economy has grown, competition for dollars has expanded. Jewelry maintains an important position. But the stagnating wages for a large portion of the population has driven the business to the costume end of the business. And the cost of precious metals has only stimulated that move, bringing pressure on diamonds.
    We have little reason to think all this will change. There will be losers and winners in the business, but many more of the latter.

    1. Post
      Author

      Recycled account for around $200-300M annually, which does not explain the entire exports. Most of it is returns, but the volumes are still disproportionate. More worrying in my mind are the rough diamond figures. They cannot be explained by a reasonable legal trade.

  2. Reading this blog I, too was thinking about the recycled market. As a single store operation of modest size in a modest community we have recycled a few thousands of carats back into the trade over the last 10 years. Multiply this by thousands of stores buying goods from the public and it would really add up.
    I wonder how these diamonds might be declared as they are exported, polished, certainly, but perhaps as rough if they were being exported to be re-cut to modern expectations?

    1. Post
      Author

      Indeed Mark, rough is the issue. Rough diamonds are hard to valuate, so importing and exporting the same stone at different values is easy, especially in the US where customs are not experts on diamonds (unlike in India, Belgium and Israel, where there are specialized custom units for diamonds).

Leave a Comment